<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Worth reading this weekend</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.abetteroakland.com/worth-reading-this-weekend/2008-04-06/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.abetteroakland.com/worth-reading-this-weekend/2008-04-06</link>
	<description>The Continuing Story of a City</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 21:06:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Max Allstadt</title>
		<link>http://www.abetteroakland.com/worth-reading-this-weekend/2008-04-06#comment-980</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Allstadt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abetteroakland.com/worth-reading-this-weekend/2008-04-06#comment-980</guid>
		<description>It probably is a little simplistic.  Oaklanders are OK with it?  STAND is OK with it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It probably is a little simplistic.  Oaklanders are OK with it?  STAND is OK with it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dto510</title>
		<link>http://www.abetteroakland.com/worth-reading-this-weekend/2008-04-06#comment-979</link>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abetteroakland.com/worth-reading-this-weekend/2008-04-06#comment-979</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a broad stereotype. Only Berkeleyans seem opposed to BRT, not Oakland homeowners, so there&#039;s more going on than that. I don&#039;t think everyone drops their principles in favor of equity, but it&#039;s certainly true that the anti-BRT crowd is made up of neighborhood preservationists, who probably realize that better public transit is makes the Smart Growth argument stronger. But the cool reception it receives from the city&#039;s political leadership and local media is what&#039;s so disappointing - there is simply no will in Berkeley to make tough choices, even if it&#039;s something as straight-forward as fulfilling a Transit First pledge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a broad stereotype. Only Berkeleyans seem opposed to BRT, not Oakland homeowners, so there&#8217;s more going on than that. I don&#8217;t think everyone drops their principles in favor of equity, but it&#8217;s certainly true that the anti-BRT crowd is made up of neighborhood preservationists, who probably realize that better public transit is makes the Smart Growth argument stronger. But the cool reception it receives from the city&#8217;s political leadership and local media is what&#8217;s so disappointing &#8211; there is simply no will in Berkeley to make tough choices, even if it&#8217;s something as straight-forward as fulfilling a Transit First pledge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Allstadt</title>
		<link>http://www.abetteroakland.com/worth-reading-this-weekend/2008-04-06#comment-978</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Allstadt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abetteroakland.com/worth-reading-this-weekend/2008-04-06#comment-978</guid>
		<description>Well what do you expect?  Show me a liberal, eco-conscious, transit friendly citizen.  Then make them a homeowner and watch them drop all their principles in the interest of their equity.  There are flyers up in cafes all over town that tell of the horrors of BRT.  One of the things they complain about is the fact that BRT will change neighborhoods along telegraph.  They don&#039;t want the landscape to change from single-family detached homes.  Guess what? Berkeley isn&#039;t a college town any more.  It&#039;s a component of the Bay Area megalopolis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well what do you expect?  Show me a liberal, eco-conscious, transit friendly citizen.  Then make them a homeowner and watch them drop all their principles in the interest of their equity.  There are flyers up in cafes all over town that tell of the horrors of BRT.  One of the things they complain about is the fact that BRT will change neighborhoods along telegraph.  They don&#8217;t want the landscape to change from single-family detached homes.  Guess what? Berkeley isn&#8217;t a college town any more.  It&#8217;s a component of the Bay Area megalopolis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dto510</title>
		<link>http://www.abetteroakland.com/worth-reading-this-weekend/2008-04-06#comment-977</link>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abetteroakland.com/worth-reading-this-weekend/2008-04-06#comment-977</guid>
		<description>It is really shocking how hypocritical Berkeley is being about BRT. Aren&#039;t they a Transit-First City? This is exactly what Transit First means. I think we can expect opposition, but the lack of support from elected officials and the local media is very disappointing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is really shocking how hypocritical Berkeley is being about BRT. Aren&#8217;t they a Transit-First City? This is exactly what Transit First means. I think we can expect opposition, but the lack of support from elected officials and the local media is very disappointing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brell</title>
		<link>http://www.abetteroakland.com/worth-reading-this-weekend/2008-04-06#comment-973</link>
		<dc:creator>brell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abetteroakland.com/worth-reading-this-weekend/2008-04-06#comment-973</guid>
		<description>those berkeleyans need to get a clue!

either rescind Measure G (90% ghg reduction) or don&#039;t complain about being in the iraq war for oil for your way of life. don&#039;t rain on the BRT parade... what happened to economic opportunity and decent and fast transportation for the lower classes??

The Berkeley fogies against BRT are Hating on Poor People and are too attached to their CARS. Every bus rider i&#039;ve asked is highly in favor of bus-only lanes. Common theme: &quot;it&#039;s about time.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>those berkeleyans need to get a clue!</p>
<p>either rescind Measure G (90% ghg reduction) or don&#8217;t complain about being in the iraq war for oil for your way of life. don&#8217;t rain on the BRT parade&#8230; what happened to economic opportunity and decent and fast transportation for the lower classes??</p>
<p>The Berkeley fogies against BRT are Hating on Poor People and are too attached to their CARS. Every bus rider i&#8217;ve asked is highly in favor of bus-only lanes. Common theme: &#8220;it&#8217;s about time.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Becks</title>
		<link>http://www.abetteroakland.com/worth-reading-this-weekend/2008-04-06#comment-863</link>
		<dc:creator>Becks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 03:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abetteroakland.com/worth-reading-this-weekend/2008-04-06#comment-863</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the mention... I&#039;ll hopefully have some updates soon on BRT, though I&#039;m a bit distracted by state politics right now.

I too am annoyed by the repeated coverage of politicians who might run for higher offices... Jerry Brown might run for governor, Schwarzenegger might run for Senate. The fact that these stories are treated as big news repeatedly shows not only how understaffed mainstream media has become but also how short term the political memory of the public really is.

On a happier note, I too am loving Oakland Geology and was glad to stumble upon it via Brooklyn Avenue. It&#039;s nice to read about the non-political side of Oakland sometimes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the mention&#8230; I&#8217;ll hopefully have some updates soon on BRT, though I&#8217;m a bit distracted by state politics right now.</p>
<p>I too am annoyed by the repeated coverage of politicians who might run for higher offices&#8230; Jerry Brown might run for governor, Schwarzenegger might run for Senate. The fact that these stories are treated as big news repeatedly shows not only how understaffed mainstream media has become but also how short term the political memory of the public really is.</p>
<p>On a happier note, I too am loving Oakland Geology and was glad to stumble upon it via Brooklyn Avenue. It&#8217;s nice to read about the non-political side of Oakland sometimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V Smoothe</title>
		<link>http://www.abetteroakland.com/worth-reading-this-weekend/2008-04-06#comment-858</link>
		<dc:creator>V Smoothe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 20:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abetteroakland.com/worth-reading-this-weekend/2008-04-06#comment-858</guid>
		<description>That is a really nice video. Except maybe for the gratuitous close-up shot of teenage girl legs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a really nice video. Except maybe for the gratuitous close-up shot of teenage girl legs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJH</title>
		<link>http://www.abetteroakland.com/worth-reading-this-weekend/2008-04-06#comment-857</link>
		<dc:creator>MJH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 19:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abetteroakland.com/worth-reading-this-weekend/2008-04-06#comment-857</guid>
		<description>For a pretty good multimedia viewing of the Mack event mentioned please visit: 
http://www.bayareanewsgroup.com/multimedia/iba/2008/player/?f=0404mack

    “On Monday, when the sun is hot, / I wonder to myself a lot: / `Now is it true, or is it not, / That what is which and which is what?&#039;” - some smart person</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a pretty good multimedia viewing of the Mack event mentioned please visit:<br />
<a href="http://www.bayareanewsgroup.com/multimedia/iba/2008/player/?f=0404mack" rel="nofollow">http://www.bayareanewsgroup.com/multimedia/iba/2008/player/?f=0404mack</a></p>
<p>    “On Monday, when the sun is hot, / I wonder to myself a lot: / `Now is it true, or is it not, / That what is which and which is what?&#8217;” &#8211; some smart person</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V Smoothe</title>
		<link>http://www.abetteroakland.com/worth-reading-this-weekend/2008-04-06#comment-855</link>
		<dc:creator>V Smoothe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 16:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abetteroakland.com/worth-reading-this-weekend/2008-04-06#comment-855</guid>
		<description>Andrew - 

You&#039;re welcome! Thank you for writing the blog. I have to confess, as the daughter of a geologist, I endured to more than my fair share of enthusiastic lectures about rocks as a child, and of course I hated it and decided that the earth was unbelievably boring. As I get older, I find myself realizing that my parents were right about an awful lot of things after all, and geology is definitely one of them.

Around these parts, we spend a lot of time fighting about responsible land use - the costs of sprawl and the benefits of infill development, and the congestion, parking, and quality of life changes that may accompany it. I never spend any time thinking about land use choices in the hills, so your &lt;a href=&quot;http://oaklandgeology.wordpress.com/2007/12/07/the-high-hills/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;thoughts&lt;/a&gt; on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://oaklandgeology.wordpress.com/2008/02/15/the-dangerous-hills/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;matter&lt;/a&gt; were really interesting to me. 

Ralph - 

You&#039;re &lt;strike&gt;probably&lt;/strike&gt; right. Chinatown has been shut out of the process, and they deserve their own forum to talk about it. I&#039;m just so frustrated with this entire process and really resentful that the draft zoning chapter is coming back to &lt;strike&gt;CED&lt;/strike&gt; ZUC next week and there has been no additional opportunity for input since the last meeting.

&lt;i&gt;edited a day later to correct some errors&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew &#8211; </p>
<p>You&#8217;re welcome! Thank you for writing the blog. I have to confess, as the daughter of a geologist, I endured to more than my fair share of enthusiastic lectures about rocks as a child, and of course I hated it and decided that the earth was unbelievably boring. As I get older, I find myself realizing that my parents were right about an awful lot of things after all, and geology is definitely one of them.</p>
<p>Around these parts, we spend a lot of time fighting about responsible land use &#8211; the costs of sprawl and the benefits of infill development, and the congestion, parking, and quality of life changes that may accompany it. I never spend any time thinking about land use choices in the hills, so your <a href="http://oaklandgeology.wordpress.com/2007/12/07/the-high-hills/" rel="nofollow">thoughts</a> on the <a href="http://oaklandgeology.wordpress.com/2008/02/15/the-dangerous-hills/" rel="nofollow">matter</a> were really interesting to me. </p>
<p>Ralph &#8211; </p>
<p>You&#8217;re <strike>probably</strike> right. Chinatown has been shut out of the process, and they deserve their own forum to talk about it. I&#8217;m just so frustrated with this entire process and really resentful that the draft zoning chapter is coming back to <strike>CED</strike> ZUC next week and there has been no additional opportunity for input since the last meeting.</p>
<p><i>edited a day later to correct some errors</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph</title>
		<link>http://www.abetteroakland.com/worth-reading-this-weekend/2008-04-06#comment-854</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 05:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abetteroakland.com/worth-reading-this-weekend/2008-04-06#comment-854</guid>
		<description>ps: can you tell i am bit annoyed with the whole thing.

Note: someone should probably do some research but I think this meeting in Chinatown was planned before the ZUC told the planning committee to have a mtg within the CBD.  Correct me if i am wrong but this mtg was scheduled as a response asked at the boathouse mtg. 

looks like the planning peeps plan to use this as that CBD mtg and claim to have met their requirements.  honestly for the most part I am not opposed to the development in the CBD.  I would probably prefer varied heights and footprints across all zones.  But more than anything I want construction. 

I can envision an Oakland with a downtown arts center like the DTC in Denver.  A couple of restaurants.  A hotel or two for visiting artist. why do they perform in Oakland but sleep in SF?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ps: can you tell i am bit annoyed with the whole thing.</p>
<p>Note: someone should probably do some research but I think this meeting in Chinatown was planned before the ZUC told the planning committee to have a mtg within the CBD.  Correct me if i am wrong but this mtg was scheduled as a response asked at the boathouse mtg. </p>
<p>looks like the planning peeps plan to use this as that CBD mtg and claim to have met their requirements.  honestly for the most part I am not opposed to the development in the CBD.  I would probably prefer varied heights and footprints across all zones.  But more than anything I want construction. </p>
<p>I can envision an Oakland with a downtown arts center like the DTC in Denver.  A couple of restaurants.  A hotel or two for visiting artist. why do they perform in Oakland but sleep in SF?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

