<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photo Friday: Industrial Underutilization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.abetteroakland.com/photo-friday-industrial-underutilization/2008-03-07/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.abetteroakland.com/photo-friday-industrial-underutilization/2008-03-07</link>
	<description>The Continuing Story of a City</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 21:06:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dto510</title>
		<link>http://www.abetteroakland.com/photo-friday-industrial-underutilization/2008-03-07#comment-595</link>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 23:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abetteroakland.com/photo-friday-industrial-underutilization/2008-03-07#comment-595</guid>
		<description>Wow, these buildings sure need to be preserved!

Not.

So, the Trib says General Plan Amendments from industrial to residential is a &quot;trend.&quot; I think a trend would mean at least twice a year. So, since 2003, basically four years: eight General Plan amendments? That would be a trend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, these buildings sure need to be preserved!</p>
<p>Not.</p>
<p>So, the Trib says General Plan Amendments from industrial to residential is a &#8220;trend.&#8221; I think a trend would mean at least twice a year. So, since 2003, basically four years: eight General Plan amendments? That would be a trend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

