<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New and improved Crimespotting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.abetteroakland.com/new-and-improved-crimespotting/2009-06-03/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.abetteroakland.com/new-and-improved-crimespotting/2009-06-03</link>
	<description>The Continuing Story of a City</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 21:06:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: VivekB</title>
		<link>http://www.abetteroakland.com/new-and-improved-crimespotting/2009-06-03#comment-214161</link>
		<dc:creator>VivekB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abetteroakland.com/?p=3188#comment-214161</guid>
		<description>FYI, indeed, I was wrong, Michael showed me how to use their http API to pull down lots of data. I just pulled down 1/1/08-&gt;5/30/09 for an analysis.  If you&#039;re  interested, I sent him the 2005 &amp; 2007 data to load into their site I have as their data doesn&#039;t start until mid-2007, but it&#039;s not totally apples &amp; oranges. My data is from OPD, which is strictly crime reports, while theirs is from the City of Oakland&#039;s IT dept, which includes &#039;incidents&#039; (aka, calls for service that may not result in a crime report).

I&#039;ll do an analysis shortly to see how much higher the #s are with incidents, my quick view seemed to be anywhere from 1% to 15% based on factors i haven&#039;t yet determined yet.

Big thanks to CrimeSpotting and Michael for providing this service - it allowed me to resume my monthly crime analysis and compare to 2008, and is very much appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI, indeed, I was wrong, Michael showed me how to use their http API to pull down lots of data. I just pulled down 1/1/08-&gt;5/30/09 for an analysis.  If you&#8217;re  interested, I sent him the 2005 &amp; 2007 data to load into their site I have as their data doesn&#8217;t start until mid-2007, but it&#8217;s not totally apples &amp; oranges. My data is from OPD, which is strictly crime reports, while theirs is from the City of Oakland&#8217;s IT dept, which includes &#8216;incidents&#8217; (aka, calls for service that may not result in a crime report).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll do an analysis shortly to see how much higher the #s are with incidents, my quick view seemed to be anywhere from 1% to 15% based on factors i haven&#8217;t yet determined yet.</p>
<p>Big thanks to CrimeSpotting and Michael for providing this service &#8211; it allowed me to resume my monthly crime analysis and compare to 2008, and is very much appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MayB/JuanC</title>
		<link>http://www.abetteroakland.com/new-and-improved-crimespotting/2009-06-03#comment-173951</link>
		<dc:creator>MayB/JuanC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 23:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abetteroakland.com/?p=3188#comment-173951</guid>
		<description>Tony, who are you speaking to when you say &quot;you folks&quot;? Are you not an Oaklnad resident? And you provided the race of the perpetrators but not the race of the victims. What race are they?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony, who are you speaking to when you say &#8220;you folks&#8221;? Are you not an Oaklnad resident? And you provided the race of the perpetrators but not the race of the victims. What race are they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.abetteroakland.com/new-and-improved-crimespotting/2009-06-03#comment-170596</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 18:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abetteroakland.com/?p=3188#comment-170596</guid>
		<description>Within last couple of months, my 88 year old grandpa was hit in the face and robbed by 3 young black men in the Lake Merrit area. Then my aunt&#039;s purse was snatched by another young black man. This is in addition to the other 3 incidents that&#039;s occurred in the same area over the last several years. Oakland&#039;s a fucked up place to live. Why can&#039;t you folks instill some better values in your young ones? I know that in my family, that kind of shit would never fly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Within last couple of months, my 88 year old grandpa was hit in the face and robbed by 3 young black men in the Lake Merrit area. Then my aunt&#8217;s purse was snatched by another young black man. This is in addition to the other 3 incidents that&#8217;s occurred in the same area over the last several years. Oakland&#8217;s a fucked up place to live. Why can&#8217;t you folks instill some better values in your young ones? I know that in my family, that kind of shit would never fly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ann</title>
		<link>http://www.abetteroakland.com/new-and-improved-crimespotting/2009-06-03#comment-169149</link>
		<dc:creator>ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 04:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abetteroakland.com/?p=3188#comment-169149</guid>
		<description>Thank Goodness!

I recently noticed an increase in activity in my hood 22X (Dimond) so I did a 90 day search on Crimewatch. Did you know we&#039;ve had 13 murders in the Dimond this year. I called Quan&#039;s office and got Richard who said sounds &quot;fishy&quot; but not his department. He transferred me to another staffer said it&#039;s probably a data error but he&#039;d have to go through stacks of written reports to find the actual number and he had a caller on another line.

Last I checked they hadn&#039;t fixed the site, maybe the violent crime reduction is just a lost folder in someone&#039;s drawer.

Good thing we&#039;ve got someone smart looking at this.

Ann</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank Goodness!</p>
<p>I recently noticed an increase in activity in my hood 22X (Dimond) so I did a 90 day search on Crimewatch. Did you know we&#8217;ve had 13 murders in the Dimond this year. I called Quan&#8217;s office and got Richard who said sounds &#8220;fishy&#8221; but not his department. He transferred me to another staffer said it&#8217;s probably a data error but he&#8217;d have to go through stacks of written reports to find the actual number and he had a caller on another line.</p>
<p>Last I checked they hadn&#8217;t fixed the site, maybe the violent crime reduction is just a lost folder in someone&#8217;s drawer.</p>
<p>Good thing we&#8217;ve got someone smart looking at this.</p>
<p>Ann</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ann</title>
		<link>http://www.abetteroakland.com/new-and-improved-crimespotting/2009-06-03#comment-169141</link>
		<dc:creator>ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 04:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abetteroakland.com/?p=3188#comment-169141</guid>
		<description>Thank goodness for smart neighbors!

I recently noticed an increase in activity in my hood 22X (Dimond) so I did a 90 day search on Crimewatch. Did you know we&#039;ve had 13 murders in the Dimond this year. I called Quan&#039;s office and got Richard who said sounds &quot;fishy&quot; but not his department. He transferred me to another staffer said it&#039;s probably a data error but he&#039;d have to go through stacks of written reports to find the actual number and he had a caller on another line.

Last I checked they hadn&#039;t fixed the site, maybe the violent crime reduction is just a lost folder in someone&#039;s drawer.

Good thing we&#039;ve got someone smart looking at this.

Ann</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank goodness for smart neighbors!</p>
<p>I recently noticed an increase in activity in my hood 22X (Dimond) so I did a 90 day search on Crimewatch. Did you know we&#8217;ve had 13 murders in the Dimond this year. I called Quan&#8217;s office and got Richard who said sounds &#8220;fishy&#8221; but not his department. He transferred me to another staffer said it&#8217;s probably a data error but he&#8217;d have to go through stacks of written reports to find the actual number and he had a caller on another line.</p>
<p>Last I checked they hadn&#8217;t fixed the site, maybe the violent crime reduction is just a lost folder in someone&#8217;s drawer.</p>
<p>Good thing we&#8217;ve got someone smart looking at this.</p>
<p>Ann</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VivekB</title>
		<link>http://www.abetteroakland.com/new-and-improved-crimespotting/2009-06-03#comment-169084</link>
		<dc:creator>VivekB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 03:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abetteroakland.com/?p=3188#comment-169084</guid>
		<description>I know the PSOs for 11x/12x/12y/13x/13y, they all come to the 12Y/13X NCPC meetings, will send to you shortly. They&#039;re all generally awesome officers &amp; people, makes me happy they&#039;re on the good side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know the PSOs for 11x/12x/12y/13x/13y, they all come to the 12Y/13X NCPC meetings, will send to you shortly. They&#8217;re all generally awesome officers &amp; people, makes me happy they&#8217;re on the good side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michal Migurski</title>
		<link>http://www.abetteroakland.com/new-and-improved-crimespotting/2009-06-03#comment-168895</link>
		<dc:creator>Michal Migurski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 01:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abetteroakland.com/?p=3188#comment-168895</guid>
		<description>Alllllright, one down, 50+ to go: http://oakland.crimespotting.org/beat/01X

Thanks Joanna!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alllllright, one down, 50+ to go: <a href="http://oakland.crimespotting.org/beat/01X" rel="nofollow">http://oakland.crimespotting.org/beat/01X</a></p>
<p>Thanks Joanna!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gem s</title>
		<link>http://www.abetteroakland.com/new-and-improved-crimespotting/2009-06-03#comment-168830</link>
		<dc:creator>gem s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 01:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abetteroakland.com/?p=3188#comment-168830</guid>
		<description>David Sasaki: &quot;Why does Crimespotting Oakland get so much love but projects like The Organic City and Youth Radio, which set out to tell positive stories about Oakland, get ignored?&quot;

 Crimespotting is a utility, and it gets props because it is an easy to use, easy to understand tool. Once it is built, it doesn&#039;t require any input other than on a very basic, data driven level Organic City on the other hand, requires a lot of creative input since it is entirely content driven, as does Youth Radio. Those websites aren&#039;t tools in and of themselves, they are platforms for expression. It doesn&#039;t make any sense at all to make these sorts of comparisons because they are entirely different. Crimespotting isn&#039;t competing with Organic City or Youth Radio.

&quot;Or to meet the information needs of all of Oakland’s neighborhoods?&quot;

I&#039;m not sure what you are trying to say here. Mike began Crimespotting as a personal project because what the City of Oakland provided was total junk. So the impetus was entirely grass-roots. I&#039;m not sure if you&#039;re saying that people in the poorer parts of Oakland don&#039;t care about crime reports or what- that seems like a strange generalization to make anyway. IMO,  the information needs of Oakland citizens starts with access, like computers in libraries, and libraries that are open. something that lots of people are working to make reality. Beyond that &quot;meeting the information needs of all of Oakland citizens&quot; is incredibly vague.  I wouldn&#039;t expect one site with one extremely specific purpose to meet everyone&#039;s needs. However any other needs aren&#039;t going to be met either if they aren&#039;t ever articulated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Sasaki: &#8220;Why does Crimespotting Oakland get so much love but projects like The Organic City and Youth Radio, which set out to tell positive stories about Oakland, get ignored?&#8221;</p>
<p> Crimespotting is a utility, and it gets props because it is an easy to use, easy to understand tool. Once it is built, it doesn&#8217;t require any input other than on a very basic, data driven level Organic City on the other hand, requires a lot of creative input since it is entirely content driven, as does Youth Radio. Those websites aren&#8217;t tools in and of themselves, they are platforms for expression. It doesn&#8217;t make any sense at all to make these sorts of comparisons because they are entirely different. Crimespotting isn&#8217;t competing with Organic City or Youth Radio.</p>
<p>&#8220;Or to meet the information needs of all of Oakland’s neighborhoods?&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure what you are trying to say here. Mike began Crimespotting as a personal project because what the City of Oakland provided was total junk. So the impetus was entirely grass-roots. I&#8217;m not sure if you&#8217;re saying that people in the poorer parts of Oakland don&#8217;t care about crime reports or what- that seems like a strange generalization to make anyway. IMO,  the information needs of Oakland citizens starts with access, like computers in libraries, and libraries that are open. something that lots of people are working to make reality. Beyond that &#8220;meeting the information needs of all of Oakland citizens&#8221; is incredibly vague.  I wouldn&#8217;t expect one site with one extremely specific purpose to meet everyone&#8217;s needs. However any other needs aren&#8217;t going to be met either if they aren&#8217;t ever articulated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.abetteroakland.com/new-and-improved-crimespotting/2009-06-03#comment-168364</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abetteroakland.com/?p=3188#comment-168364</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure the SL Police helps but I think the development around Durant Square makes a bit of a difference, also. Pride of ownership.

 But you can sure see the difference once you get to 98th, immediate downturn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure the SL Police helps but I think the development around Durant Square makes a bit of a difference, also. Pride of ownership.</p>
<p> But you can sure see the difference once you get to 98th, immediate downturn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: livegreen</title>
		<link>http://www.abetteroakland.com/new-and-improved-crimespotting/2009-06-03#comment-168363</link>
		<dc:creator>livegreen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abetteroakland.com/?p=3188#comment-168363</guid>
		<description>David,   Actually I think their proximity to SL (for the reasons you mention) HAS helped those neighborhoods stay different.   I&#039;ve driven through some of those streets and they resemble San Leandro more than Oakland, with working class and middle class home-owners (all races, but more Af-Am on the Oakland side) where the houses are well taken care of.  As you drive further and further away from SL, they gradually deteriorate.

A hills realtor told me that neighborhood is not well known, but safe and a good place to live. 

Drive by some time.  Start on E.14ht in SL, go a block or a few blocks into Oakland and make a right.  Drive around, you&#039;ll see what I mean.  Then go a few blocks further and it gradually deteriorates (some blocks will have a mixture of both before the final transition...).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,   Actually I think their proximity to SL (for the reasons you mention) HAS helped those neighborhoods stay different.   I&#8217;ve driven through some of those streets and they resemble San Leandro more than Oakland, with working class and middle class home-owners (all races, but more Af-Am on the Oakland side) where the houses are well taken care of.  As you drive further and further away from SL, they gradually deteriorate.</p>
<p>A hills realtor told me that neighborhood is not well known, but safe and a good place to live. </p>
<p>Drive by some time.  Start on E.14ht in SL, go a block or a few blocks into Oakland and make a right.  Drive around, you&#8217;ll see what I mean.  Then go a few blocks further and it gradually deteriorates (some blocks will have a mixture of both before the final transition&#8230;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

