<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bad news about City Walk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.abetteroakland.com/bad-news-about-city-walk/2007-10-05/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.abetteroakland.com/bad-news-about-city-walk/2007-10-05</link>
	<description>The Continuing Story of a City</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 21:06:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Owen</title>
		<link>http://www.abetteroakland.com/bad-news-about-city-walk/2007-10-05#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 20:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abetteroakland.com/bad-news-about-city-walk/2007-10-05#comment-237</guid>
		<description>Hey V, are you aware of this project? http://www.portofoakland.com/realesta/deve_01i.asp

I&#039;m curious to hear what your take on it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey V, are you aware of this project? <a href="http://www.portofoakland.com/realesta/deve_01i.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.portofoakland.com/realesta/deve_01i.asp</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious to hear what your take on it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V Smoothe</title>
		<link>http://www.abetteroakland.com/bad-news-about-city-walk/2007-10-05#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>V Smoothe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 22:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abetteroakland.com/bad-news-about-city-walk/2007-10-05#comment-232</guid>
		<description>dto510 - 

I don&#039;t know where that line in the article came from either. Later on, the story talks about the slow progress of the Dones project near Uptown, but basically just says that there were contractor issues and that it will be completed in the spring.

Then there&#039;s this:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Over the past six months, three of the projects on the city&#039;s official list of &quot;Major Development Projects&quot; have been withdrawn or become inactive.

They include a 356-unit condo tower at 226 13th Street, a 315-residential-unit project called Cathedral Park at 2100 Martin Luther King Jr. Way in the Upper Broadway district of downtown and a 43-story tower at 1930 Broadway that was to mix office with housing, retail or hotel and is being reconfigured.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I don&#039;t know anything about Cathedral Park, but the other two don&#039;t surprise me at all. Neither ever got very far off the ground. 226 13th had significant community opposition and I don&#039;t think anyone took the tower at 1930 seriously. And if you look at the major projects list, 3 buildings is hardly a significant dent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dto510 &#8211; </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know where that line in the article came from either. Later on, the story talks about the slow progress of the Dones project near Uptown, but basically just says that there were contractor issues and that it will be completed in the spring.</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s this:</p>
<blockquote><p>Over the past six months, three of the projects on the city&#8217;s official list of &#8220;Major Development Projects&#8221; have been withdrawn or become inactive.</p>
<p>They include a 356-unit condo tower at 226 13th Street, a 315-residential-unit project called Cathedral Park at 2100 Martin Luther King Jr. Way in the Upper Broadway district of downtown and a 43-story tower at 1930 Broadway that was to mix office with housing, retail or hotel and is being reconfigured.</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t know anything about Cathedral Park, but the other two don&#8217;t surprise me at all. Neither ever got very far off the ground. 226 13th had significant community opposition and I don&#8217;t think anyone took the tower at 1930 seriously. And if you look at the major projects list, 3 buildings is hardly a significant dent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dto510</title>
		<link>http://www.abetteroakland.com/bad-news-about-city-walk/2007-10-05#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 21:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abetteroakland.com/bad-news-about-city-walk/2007-10-05#comment-231</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know what evidence the SFBT has for saying that &quot;developers throughout the city (are going) back to the drawing board.&quot; Who knows what&#039;s up with Olson? Maybe they just need a few months to restruture their construction financing. Steve R, you&#039;re right - the DTO is on a roll and one delayed project isn&#039;t a big deal in the long-term.

According to the SFBT, the City Walk Starbucks will be 2500 square feet, BTW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know what evidence the SFBT has for saying that &#8220;developers throughout the city (are going) back to the drawing board.&#8221; Who knows what&#8217;s up with Olson? Maybe they just need a few months to restruture their construction financing. Steve R, you&#8217;re right &#8211; the DTO is on a roll and one delayed project isn&#8217;t a big deal in the long-term.</p>
<p>According to the SFBT, the City Walk Starbucks will be 2500 square feet, BTW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve R</title>
		<link>http://www.abetteroakland.com/bad-news-about-city-walk/2007-10-05#comment-230</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 21:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abetteroakland.com/bad-news-about-city-walk/2007-10-05#comment-230</guid>
		<description>It isn&#039;t surprising that there&#039;s fear of a glut in a down market, but it does seem a little short-sighted. Downtown really seeems on a roll now, but Olson will complete it sometime, the real estate market will rebound sometime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It isn&#8217;t surprising that there&#8217;s fear of a glut in a down market, but it does seem a little short-sighted. Downtown really seeems on a roll now, but Olson will complete it sometime, the real estate market will rebound sometime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V Smoothe</title>
		<link>http://www.abetteroakland.com/bad-news-about-city-walk/2007-10-05#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>V Smoothe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 19:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abetteroakland.com/bad-news-about-city-walk/2007-10-05#comment-229</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I thought that was strange as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I thought that was strange as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dto510</title>
		<link>http://www.abetteroakland.com/bad-news-about-city-walk/2007-10-05#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 19:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abetteroakland.com/bad-news-about-city-walk/2007-10-05#comment-228</guid>
		<description>I noticed they stopped construction - I figured they were trying to slow down or something. Olson is a very large company, so it&#039;s odd that they would have cash-flow problems (though they recently announced very poor earnings). Their sales office is still open.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed they stopped construction &#8211; I figured they were trying to slow down or something. Olson is a very large company, so it&#8217;s odd that they would have cash-flow problems (though they recently announced very poor earnings). Their sales office is still open.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

