<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 601 City Center</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.abetteroakland.com/601-city-center/2008-08-04/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.abetteroakland.com/601-city-center/2008-08-04</link>
	<description>The Continuing Story of a City</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 21:06:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: oaklandhappenings</title>
		<link>http://www.abetteroakland.com/601-city-center/2008-08-04#comment-5851</link>
		<dc:creator>oaklandhappenings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 11:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abetteroakland.com/601-city-center/2008-08-04#comment-5851</guid>
		<description>Navigator, I agree, although citywalk now seems to be getting back on schedule, as V&#039;s later blog indicates.  BTW, are you the same &#039;Navigator&#039; from the Chronicle comment page?  Just curious.  V, I never saw this blog entry, until I just now did a search for 601 city center.  Thank you!   That building sure as hell better get done!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Navigator, I agree, although citywalk now seems to be getting back on schedule, as V&#8217;s later blog indicates.  BTW, are you the same &#8216;Navigator&#8217; from the Chronicle comment page?  Just curious.  V, I never saw this blog entry, until I just now did a search for 601 city center.  Thank you!   That building sure as hell better get done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Navigator</title>
		<link>http://www.abetteroakland.com/601-city-center/2008-08-04#comment-3341</link>
		<dc:creator>Navigator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 01:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abetteroakland.com/601-city-center/2008-08-04#comment-3341</guid>
		<description>Looks like a great addition to downtown Oakland. If only the developers of that &quot;City Walk&quot; development get on the ball and finish those condos. Right now that site is causing blight on what should be a beautiful, clean and modern downtown. However, the Shorenstein building looks awesome and should be a landmark downtown for years to come.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a great addition to downtown Oakland. If only the developers of that &#8220;City Walk&#8221; development get on the ball and finish those condos. Right now that site is causing blight on what should be a beautiful, clean and modern downtown. However, the Shorenstein building looks awesome and should be a landmark downtown for years to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph</title>
		<link>http://www.abetteroakland.com/601-city-center/2008-08-04#comment-3130</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abetteroakland.com/601-city-center/2008-08-04#comment-3130</guid>
		<description>schweet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>schweet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

